• IDs
  
• ID is the same as the ID on the Actor.
• LitigantNumber- same as ID, without the initial segment indicating the court
  
• CaseNumber- same as ID, without the two litigant-related segments at the end
  
• TransactionType- distinguishes between payment vouchers and bonds.
• Number- an ordinal/sequence ID for the bonds and vouchers (the nth bond or the nth voucher on the case). Since courts sometimes delete payments, these are occasionally re-used and should not be relied upon as the sole ID for a transaction. See below for more on cross-reference IDs.
• Receipt- this is a "one-up" sequence number, the payor's receipt number. It is provided with the records of initial payments, not Audit records due to change/deletion. It does NOT change once set. But because receipt numbers are only six-digits, they do "roll over" occasionally, especially in large courts.
• Type- indicates payment method (cash, personal check etc.)
  • In courts using the JIMS case management system- payments originally receipted by a collection agency, the Type will be "Collect agn chk" or "Collect agn EFT", depending upon how the funds were conveyed to the court by the agency.
  • The "Audit" Type is used on records which correspond to the change/deletion of a previous payment.
• ReceiptDate attribute (only for initial payment records, not Audit records provided due to change/deletion)- because the court can't "back date" a payment into a month which closed the previous day, the ReceiptDate must always represent the day the court got its money. So in the case of agency-receipted payments, this may not match the agency's receipt date. See also Date formats in Judici XML
• Amount attribute- this reflects the entire payment, without regard to whether a bond has been applied or is still pending. On Audit type records, it represents the incremental amount by which the payment was changed.
• Reference- this is an alpha-numeric field for the incoming check number.  For example:
  
• The number on a check from the litigant or a collection agency.
• An EFT transaction ID
• ModificationType- not used
  
• ID is the litigant ID corresponding to the ID on the Actor.
  
• FullName
  
• Financial audit log attributes
• CollectionsFeeDistribution- this indicates how much of the payment was applied to the "SA Collections" fee.  This can be used to verify whether the court is distributing a collection agency its fair share of incoming payment. 
  
• If the court gets behind for whatever reason, they will at some point begin distributing more than the usual percentage and will eventually catch up.
  
• Note that this fee amount is not provided for records whose Type is "Audit" (see above), or for A/R adjustment records.  So if the court changes an existing payment's distribution or the amount owed on a case, the web service will not provide a collections agency with any info on the amount of the new or revised collections fee distribution.  So those interested in tracking what portion of an A/R or changed payment is collections fees should speak with their Judici rep about how they can do so.
• ReclassDate- indicates the date, if any, on which a pending bond was applied
  

• A negative one of Type "Audit", which vacates the payment.
• A positive one of Type "Audit" which parks the same amount in a bond on the case
• A negative one of the original payment Type, for the same amount when the bond is transferred off of the case

When a payment is changed, you get two <Payment> elements:

• A negative one of Type "Audit", "backing out" the payment
• A positive on for the new payment amount